Blog

Specter: 51 votes enough to pass health care - Philly Inq

Sen. Arlen Specter says he will support a parliamentary maneuver to push revised health-care legislation through the Senate, a step that he said last year would be a "colossal mistake."

Sen. Arlen Specter says he will support a parliamentary maneuver to push revised health-care legislation through the Senate, a step that he said last year would be a "colossal mistake."

Specter and at least 22 other Democratic senators have signed a letter urging Majority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev.) to bring health-care changes to a vote under budget reconciliation rules. That approach allows bills to pass with a simple majority of 51 votes instead of the 60 it takes to cut off a filibuster in the Senate.

"This is yet another in a long list of cynical 180-degree reversals for Arlen Specter," Republican Pat Toomey, the former congressman who is seeking to unseat Specter, said yesterday.

Specter countered that he had left the door open to using reconcilation as a "last, last resort," and argued that legislative gridlock on health care made it necessary.

Specter, who was a Republican until switching to the Democratic Party last spring, is running for a sixth term and faces a primary challenge from Rep. Joe Sestak.

"We have gone through a long, torturous process of about a year," Specter said in an interview yesterday. "It's important - millions without coverage, insurance companies raising premiums, the ban on coverage of preexisting conditions." He said the requirement of a supermajority to limit debate should not be "concrete to stop us from governing."

Negotiations over a compromise health-care bill that could win approval in both houses of Congress stalled in January after the election of Sen. Scott Brown (R., Mass.) deprived Democrats of a filibuster-proof majority. Now, Reid and other Democrats are talking about using reconciliation to pass legislation, a move that some Republicans call the "nuclear option."

Specter said he had "done a lot more research and found that reconciliation has been used some 22 times in analogous circumstances."

The procedure has been used to ease the passage of major legislation, including COBRA, which allows employees to continue health benefits when they lose jobs; the SCHIP children's health-insurance program; and the 1996 overhaul of the national welfare system.

Sen. Bob Casey (D., Pa.) believes reconciliation should be an option if needed, his spokesman said.

Republicans argue that using reconciliation to pass the Democrats' health-care overhaul would be an unfair attempt to thwart the will of the voters, who, they say, have rejected the plan.

Specter told bloggers on a Tuesday conference call that voters wanted to see Congress move forward on a big issue. He added, according to the Web site PoliticsPA, that most people "won't really understand the technicalities and nuances" of the parliamentary rules.

That attitude is "condescending and arrogant," Toomey said. "The public knows it doesn't want a multitrillion-dollar takeover of health care."

CONTINUE READING INKY PIECE...

YESTERDAY'S TOOMEY for SENATE POST...

 

Comments

thanks!

really useful for me :) thanks!

-------------------------------------
All about High Quality movies
1080p movies blog

I asked Specter not to vote Dec. 24th, today I got his response.

Re: Obamacare‏
From: Senator_Specter@Specter.Senate.gov
Sent: Tue 3/02/10 10:38 AM
To: edieky@hotmail.com

Dear Mrs. Quinn:

Thank you for contacting my office regarding health reform. On December 24, 2009, I voted in favor of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which the Senate passed by a vote of 60-39. This legislation is an important step in ensuring adequate health care becomes a right in America and not just a privilege.

This legislation extends coverage to 31 million more Americans. It also has important insurance reforms: no longer can an insurance company reject a claim because of a pre-existing condition; no longer can there be a lifetime limit on insurance coverage. It also provides subsidies to those who need assistance and tax credits for small businesses that offer health care to their employees. Notably, it is projected to reduce the deficit by $132 billion in the next ten years and by greater amounts in the following decade. However, the bill lacks provisions that I would have preferred. I would like to see a strong, robust public option. I would like to see more clear-cut language on a woman's right to choose.

I consider the legislation similar to the Civil Rights Act of 1965. It was a very good law, but it took a preliminary legislative enactment in 1957 and another in 1964 - each an incremental step - to set the stage for what was satisfactory and adequate civil rights legislation. This bill is the first step in health reform and I look forward to continuing to improve this legislation in the future.

Again, I appreciate your taking the time to bring your views on this issue to my attention. The concerns of my constituents are of great importance to me, and I rely on you and other Pennsylvanians to inform me of your views. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact my office or visit my website at http://specter.senate.gov.

Sincerely,

Arlen Specter

SEN. SPECTER HAS TO GO AFTER I ASKED HIM NOT TO VOTE FOR Obama Care - APPARENTLY HE CAN'T HEAR ME!

Post new comment

Pat Toomey is a man of conviction and will stand for what we, the people of Pennsylvania, believe in.

- Justin Armstrong, Pittsburgh.

Endorse Pat Toomey

Make a Contribution

Team Toomey

Member Login

Tell a Friend About Pat

Telling friends about Pat help's build a movement.